Dockets LA10010, LA10011, LA10012, LA10013 and LA10023 IN THE MATTER of appeals by Heather McBeath and Wanda Wood of several decisions of the Community of Victoria. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Friday, the 21st day of December, 2012. Allan
Rankin, Vice-Chair
Contents Appearances & Witnesses Reasons for Order
Order Appearances & Witnesses 1. For the Appellants Heath McBeath and Wanda Wood Not Present 2. For the Respondent Community of Victoria Hillary Price Reasons for Order 1. Introduction [1]
The Appellants Heather McBeath
and Wanda Wood filed five Notices of Appeal with the Island Regulatory and
Appeals Commission (the Commission) under section 28 of the
Planning Act,
R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. P-8, (the
Planning Act).
[2] The Notice of Appeal for
LA10010 was filed on May 20, 2010 and pertains to a decision of the
Respondent Community of Victoria (the Respondent) dated April 16, 2010. [3] The Notice of Appeal for
LA10011 was filed on May 25, 2010 and pertains to a decision of the
Respondent of unknown date. [4] The Notice of Appeal for
LA10012 was filed on June 16, 2010 and pertains to a decision of the
Respondent of May 28, 2010. [5] The Notice of Appeal for
LA10013 was filed on June 16, 2010 and pertains to a decision of the
Respondent dated June 7, 2010. [6] The Notice of Appeal for
LA10013 was filed on October 13, 2010 and pertains to a decision of the
Respondent dated September "27-28", 2010. [7] On May 25, 2010 the
Respondent requested that appeal LA10010 be held in abeyance pending the
outcome of an earlier appeal involving the same parties, LA09014.
The Commission granted that request and subsequently extended the
abeyance to LA10010 through LA10013 and LA10023. [8] On April 7th, 2011, the
Commission issued Order
LA11-05 ordering that the Commission had no jurisdiction to hear
appeal LA09014. [9] On March 21, 2012, the
Appellant Heather McBeath (Ms. McBeath) contacted Commission staff about
the possibility of holding a meeting between the parties to discuss the
various appeals. The
Respondent was receptive to this proposal.
Ms. McBeath later advised that the Appellant Wanda Wood (Ms. Wood)
was not interested in pursuing a meeting of the parties.
[10] On November 13, 2012
the Commission advised the parties by email and ordinary mail that a
hearing of appeals LA10010 through LA10013 and LA10023 would be held on
December 10, 2012. On November
13, 2012 Ms. McBeath advised the Commission that she would not participate
in the hearing as she no longer has an interest in the matter.
[11] On December 3, 2012, a
newspaper notice of the hearing was published in the Charlottetown
Guardian newspaper.
[12] On December 3, 2012,
Ms. Wood advised the Commission that she would not attend the hearing as
it was not her intention to pursue the appeals any further.
On December 4, 2012 the Commission advised the Respondent that
neither Appellant intended to appear at the hearing. [13] The Commission decided
to proceed with the public hearing as scheduled on December 10, 2012 as
the hearing was advertised in the Guardian and interested members
of the public might wish to appear and be heard.
[14] The Commission heard
the matter on December 10, 2012.
As anticipated, neither Appellant appeared.
The Respondent was represented by Hillary Price, Chief
Administrative Officer. No
members of the public were present. 2. Findings [15] Given that the
Appellants did not wish to proceed with their appeals and advised the
Commission accordingly, the Commission determined that the appeals were
abandoned and thus these appeals are hereby dismissed.
[16] An Order dismissing these appeals follows. Order
NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Planning Act; IT IS ORDERED THAT
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 21st day of December, 2012. BY THE COMMISSION: Allan Rankin, Vice-Chair Maurice Rodgerson, Chair Jean Tingley, Commissioner NOTICE Section 12 of the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act reads as follows:
Parties to this proceeding seeking a review of the Commission's decision or order in this matter may do so by filing with the Commission, at the earliest date, a written Request for Review, which clearly states the reasons for the review and the nature of the relief sought. Sections 13(1) and 13(2) of the Act provide as follows:
NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years. |