Click here for a PDF version of this Order.

Docket: LP13-101
Order LP13-008

IN THE MATTER of a review of Order LP13-001 [appears on the Commission website as Order LP13-0001] issued by the Commission on September 20, 2013.

BEFORE THE COMMISSION

on Wednesday, the 16th day of October, 2013

John Broderick, Acting Vice-Chair
Michael Campbell, Commissioner
Peter McCloskey, Commissioner

Order

1. INTRODUCTION

[1]  In Order LP13-001 [appears on the Commission's website as Order LP13-0001], issued by the Commission on September 20, 2013, the Commission found that 100395 P.E.I. Inc. (the Corporation) contravened subsection 5(1) of the Lands Protection Act (the Act) when it acquired an interest in 600 acres by way of lease, without approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council; 

[2]  On October 2, 2013 the Commission noted an error in the Order number as Order LP13-001 was already in use for a separate matter.   

2. FINDINGS 

[3]  Section 12 of the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act (the IRAC Act) reads as follows:

The Commission may, in its absolute discretion, review, rescind or vary any order or decision made by it, or rehear any application before deciding it. 1991,c.18,s.12. 

[4]  In Order LA97-11, In the Matter of a Request for Review of Commission Order LA97-08 by Keir Clark and Marion Clark (Order  LA97-11 Clark), the Commission set out in some detail the test to be met on an application for a review or reconsideration of Commission decision: 

The Commission and its predecessor, the Prince Edward Island Public Utilities Commission, have considered in the past the minimum criteria an Applicant must meet before the Commission will exercise its absolute discretion in the matter of reviewing its decisions under s.12 of the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act, and the identical predecessor to s.12, s.16 of the Public Utilities Commission Act. This test has been interpreted consistently by the Commission in its past decisions. 

As noted in previous decisions, the onus rests upon the Applicant to show that a prima facie case exists which will entitle the Applicant to the review. A prima facie case will be shown only where the function of review should be exercised to correct an error of the Commission or to meet changed circumstances. 

Changed circumstances may encompass either a situation which has developed after the decision or where new evidence emerges which was not known or not available at the time the original evidence was adduced. Changed circumstances will dictate a review only if they are material.           

Finally, the power to review is discretionary and will be exercised sparingly. 

3.  DISPOSITION

[5]  That Order LP13-001 issued on September 30, 2013 should be renumbered to Order LP13-008 and read as follows.

WHEREAS pursuant to subsection 5.(1) of the Act:

A corporation shall not have an aggregate land holding in excess of five acres or having a shore frontage in excess of one hundred and sixty-five feet unless it first receives permission to do so from the Lieutenant Governor in Council.

AND WHEREAS, subsection 5.3(1) of the Act reads as follows: 

(1) Where a person or corporation intends to acquire by lease a land holding for which permission is required pursuant to section 4 or section 5, the person or corporation shall 

(a) apply pursuant to section 4 or 5 for permission to acquire by lease that specific land holding; or 

(b) apply for permission pursuant to this section to acquire by lease and to continue to hold a certain number of acres of land as part of the applicant's aggregate land holding.

AND WHEREAS, on August 28, 2012, 100395 P.E.I. Inc. (the Corporation) filed an application with the Commission to obtain approval to hold 600.00 acres of land by way of lease, pursuant to section 5.3 of the Act. The application reported that the Corporation was currently leasing in 476.10 acres; however, there was no record of the Corporation making application to Executive Council for approval to the Act to lease such land;

AND WHEREAS the application was subsequently approved by Executive Council on September 18, 2012 (Executive Council Order NO. EC2012-543);

AND WHEREAS, by Notice of Intention dated July 26, 2013, the Corporation was advised of the apparent contravention and provided an opportunity to respond;

AND WHEREAS, the Commission received a response to the Notice of Intention from the Corporation's legal counsel, dated August 20, 2013;

AND WHEREAS the Commission has fully considered the original application, the Notice of Intention, the response thereto from the Corporation's legal counsel and other relevant material before it;  

THE COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS that the Corporation has contravened the Act when it acquired an interest in 600 acres by way of lease, without approval from the Lieutenant Governor in Council;

THE COMMISSION HEREBY IMPOSES, pursuant to clause 15.1(1)(a) of the Act, a penalty in the form of $50.00 for the aforementioned contravention of the Act; 

THE COMMISSION HEREBY FIXES October 18, 2013 as the date by which the Corporation must pay the $50.00 penalty. 

DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 16th day of October, 2013.

BY THE COMMISSION:

John Broderick, Acting Vice-Chair

Michael Campbell, Commissioner

Peter McCloskey, Commissioner

TAKE NOTICE that any person or corporation that has contravened section 2, 4, 5, 5.3, 6.1 or 6.2 is liable to a penalty, pursuant to Subsection 15.1(1) of the Act, of not more than $10,000;

Subsection 15.1(3) reads as follows:

15.1(3)  If any person or corporation fails to pay any penalty imposed by the Commission within the time fixed by the Commission for the payment of the penalty, the Commission may make application, without notice to the person or corporation, to a judge of the Supreme Court for an order that judgment for the amount of the penalty or any unpaid portion of the penalty may be entered in the court against the person or corporation.

AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that Section 12 of the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act reads as follows: 

12.  The Commission may, in its absolute discretion, review, rescind or vary any order or decision made by it or rehear any application before deciding it. 

Parties to this proceeding seeking a review of the Commission's decision or order in this matter may do so by filing with the Commission, at the earliest date, a written Request for Review, which clearly states the reasons for the review and the nature of the relief sought. 

Sections 13.(1) and 13(2) of the Act provide as follows:

13.(1)  An appeal lies from a decision or order of the Commission to the Court of Appeal upon a question of law or jurisdiction.

(2)    The appeal shall be made by filing a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal within twenty days after the decision or order appealed from and the rules of the court respecting appeals apply with the necessary changes.

NOTICE: IRAC File Retention

In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.