Reasons for Order 1. Introduction The Lessor, Todd Munn, is appealing the decision of the Director of Residential Rental Property (Exhibit E-7) regarding the disbursement of the security deposit for an apartment rented by the Lessee, Neala Zoccoli, at 155 Euston Street in Charlottetown. Order LD02-183 was issued September 10, 2002. The notice of appeal was received by the Commission by fax on October 3, 2002. The appeal hearing was held on Friday, October 18, 2002. 2. Background The Lessee occupied the rental unit from February 15, 2002 until she moved out May 1, 2002. The Lessee states she gave two weeks notice to the Lessor and moved out because of the condition of the apartment, specifically the inconsistency of the heating system and problems with the water in the kitchen. The Lessor states he made improvements to the apartment, including some requested by the Lessee, prior to her occupying the unit. This included new cupboards, carpeting and painting. The Lessor claims the heat problem was only for one day, there was only one call from the Lessee, and the problems were fixed. He says he not only responded to calls but was in the building on almost a daily basis, and no other tenants complained. On the matter of the damage deposit the Lessee states she did not receive a copy of Form 8 (Exhibit E-11), and had moved out of the unit because of the problems she was experiencing with the heat and water. The Lessor states he placed Form 8 at the rental unit because he did not have a forwarding address or contact for the Lessee. The unit was not rented again until June 1, 2002 and therefore he lost the rent for the month of May because he was not given proper notice by the Lessee. The Lessee states the keys were not returned because she had been told by the Lessor that the front door lock was being changed. The Lessor claims the lock was changed because the key had not been returned. 3. Decision The key matter in this appeal relates to the filing of Form 8 (Exhibit E-11). The Commission notes that Form 8 was not produced at the original hearing, although the Lessor claimed to have served such a document. It is also noted that the Lessor failed to meet two additional deadlines set by the Director to produce the requested evidence, especially the Form 8. However, under appeal, Section 26(1) of the Act permits the parties to submit additional evidence and testimony. The Lessor produced a Form 8 which he testified, under oath, had been delivered to the apartment. The responsibility of the Lessor to serve notice of intention to retain the security deposit is contained in Section 10(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act.
Service of Notices is covered under Section 33 of the Act.
The Lessor further testified he did not have a forwarding address for the Lessee, and the Lessee had not returned the keys to the unit in question. Based on the additional evidence, and sworn testimony, the Commission must find for the Lessor. The Lessee by her own testimony indicated that she did not give one month's notice as required under Section 11(2.1) of the Rental of Residential Property Act which states:
Section 18 of the Rental of Residential Property Act states:
In the matter before the Commission the evidence indicates that written notice was not given, this fact is freely admitted by the Lessee. It is also clear that a month's notice was not given, another fact freely admitted by the Lessee. The Lessee, in anticipation of the Lessor filing a Form 8 after the original hearing, filed a Form 9, stating "my former apartment was not fit to keep living in and moved out as soon as I could find a new place". The Lessee stated at the hearing she moved out because of the heating problems and a water problem in the kitchen. However, the Lessee did not apply to the Director of Residential Rental Property for enforcement of Statutory Conditions which are outlined in Section 6 of the Rental of Residential Property Act, opting instead to vacate the premises. The evidence also indicates the Lessee remained in possession of the key she was issued for the premises until the date of the original hearing. While the Lessor may have indicated he was planning to change the locks, the Lessee should have returned the key as a final demonstration of the fact she had vacated the premises. At the time the Lessor testified he delivered the Form 8 to the apartment, the Lessee was still in possession of the key, and would have had opportunity to return to the unit and find the Form 8. For these reasons, the Commission must allow the appeal, and find in favour of the Lessor. The Lessor may retain rent in the amount of $375. for the Lessee's failure to give proper notice, and the balance is to be returned immediately to the Lessee. Order WHEREAS Todd Munn filed an appeal against a decision of the Director of Residential Rental Property dated October 3, 2002; AND WHEREAS the Commission heard the appeal in Charlottetown on October 18, 2002; NOW THEREFORE, for the reasons given in the annexed Reasons for Order; IT IS ORDERED THAT
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 24th day of October, 2002. BY THE COMMISSION: Maurice Rodgerson, Panel ChairWeston Rose, Commissioner Anne Petley, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. |