Reasons for Order 1. Introduction The Lessee appealed Order LD03-019 of the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property, dated January 24, 2003, regarding premises at 28 Hillsboro Street, Apartment #1, Charlottetown, P.E.I. The appeal was received by the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission on February 3, 2003. The appeal was heard on February 17, 2003. The Lessor was represented at the hearing by Ron Switzer and Natasha Johnston appeared as witness. The Lessee did not attend the hearing. 2. Background The Lessee rented an apartment from the Lessor at 28 Hillsboro Street in Charlottetown. The Lessee, together with another person, signed a one year rental agreement with the Lessor for the period August 4, 2001 to July 31 2002 (Exhibit E-6). The rental payments were $515.00 per month. The Lessee moved out of the apartment in early November without giving notice to the Lessor. Mr. Allen indicated in a letter dated November 25, 2002, addressed to Ms. Whalen (Exhibit E-4) that there were many things wrong with the apartment; such as, a leak in the ceiling, the carpets weren't sanitized and a security lock was broken. The Lessee said this was the reason he moved out. Mr. Switzer testified at the hearing that he dealt with any issues Mr. Allen had while he was a tenant and that he disputes the allegations made in Mr. Allen's letter. Mr. Switzer stated he tried to rent the apartment when Mr. Allen moved out but was not successful in doing so until February 1, 2002. The Commission has on file copies of newspaper ads (Exhibit E-7) showing the apartment was advertised from November 13, 2001 to January 18, 2002. 3. Decision Based on the information and evidence before the Commission the appeal is denied. In making its decision the Commission considered the documents from the office of the Director of Residential Rental Property (Exhibits E-1 to E-12) and the testimony of Mr. Switzer. It is clear from the evidence presented to the Director and at the appeal hearing that the Lessee did not give proper notice. Section 11.(2) of the Rental of Residential Property Act states:
In testimony at the original hearing Mr. Allen did not dispute the claim of rent owing, however he claimed he should not have to pay any rent due to the condition of the unit. At the appeal hearing the Lessor strenuously disputed the claims of the Lessee stating the unit was in good condition and any requests made by the Lessee were promptly addressed. In his notice of appeal to the Commission (Exhibit E-10) the Lessee suggested the circumstances of the rental property should void the rental agreement. The Commission notes that the Act provides a specific process for the Lessee to follow in having statutory conditions addressed by the Lessor. There is no evidence any such steps were taken, in fact the condition of the unit appears to have been raised after the Lessees vacated the unit. If, as the Lessee claims, problems existed that were not addressed, the Lessee could have sought an order that they be addressed. He did not. The Lessee did, however, sign a fixed term rental agreement, and has not provided any evidence that would diminish or reduce that obligation. Therefore the Order of the Director of Residential Rental Property is confirmed. Order WHEREAS Patrick Allen appealed Order LD03-019 of the Director of Residential Rental Property on February, 3, 2003; AND WHEREAS the Commission heard the appeal in Charlottetown on February 17, 2003; NOW THEREFORE, for the reasons given in the annexed Reasons for Order; IT IS ORDERED THAT ; DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 21st day of February, 2003. BY THE COMMISSION: Weston Rose, Panel Chair Maurice Rodgerson, Vice-ChairAnne Petley, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. |