Click here for a PDF version of this Order.
![](https://irac.pe.ca/images/iraclogo-n207b.gif)
Docket
LR11002
Order LR11-06
IN THE MATTER
of an appeal under Section
25 of the
Rental of Residential Property Act,
by
Rui Jiang Li against Order LD11-023 of the Director of Residential Rental
Property dated January 21, 2011.
BEFORE THE COMMISSION
on Thursday, the
3rd day of March, 2011.
John Broderick, Commissioner
Michael Campbell, Commissioner
Leonard Gallant, Commissioner
Order
On January 24, 2011 the
Commission received a Notice of Appeal dated January 23, 2011 from Rui
(Rick) Jiang Li (the Appellant) requesting an appeal of Order LD11-023,
dated January 21, 2011, said Order issued by the Director of Residential
Rental Property (the Director).
By way of background, the
Appellant served Tammy Holme with a Form 4 – Notice of Termination by Lessor
of Rental Agreement dated December 29, 2010. On January 7, 2011, Doug
Carver filed with the Director a Form 6 – Application by Lessee to Set Aside
Notice of Termination.
Order LD11-023 states, in part:
"IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The lessee's
application to set aside the Notice of Termination is valid.
2. The Notice of
Termination dated December 29, 2010 to be effective January 31, 2011 is
not valid.
3. The rental
agreement between the lessees and the lessor for the residential
premises shall remain in effect."
The Commission heard
this appeal on February 3, 2011. The Appellant was present. Tammy Holme
and Doug Carver (the Respondents) were also present.
EVIDENCE
The Appellant testified that on
two occasions, once in October 2010 and once in November 2010, he observed
that the Respondent's apartment was "very messy and dirty". The Appellant
told the Commission that he was in the process of buying the apartment
building at the time but did not yet own the building. He believes that the
previous owner had given the Respondents the required pre-inspection notice,
but he is not sure of this.
The Appellant testified that in
December 2010, when he went to collect rent from the Respondents, he stood
in the doorway and the condition of the apartment looked the same as it had
in mid November. As a result of this observation, he issued the Form 4
Notice of Termination. The Appellant stated that he did not want to risk
the health of the other tenants in the building. The Appellant stated that
the pictures filed by the Respondents showing the apartment clean and tidy
were taken after the Form 4 Notice of Termination was issued.
The Respondents testified that
the Appellant never informed them of his concerns until they received the
Form 4 Notice of Termination on December 29, 2010. The Respondents
explained that they had on hand several recycling bags filled as a result of
cleaning other units in the building. They acknowledge that the apartment
"wasn't 100%" the days the Appellant showed up. They explained that the
flies the Appellant had noticed were fruit flies. They also noted that
field mice are a common problem and can enter almost any home if there are
holes present. They also noted that, as they have small children, there
were bags of outgrown children's clothes. They also noted that they placed
storage bins in front of their DVDs to keep their children away from the
DVDs. The Respondents acknowledged that the pictures they took of the
inside of the apartment were taken shortly before the January 18, 2011
hearing before the Director.
The Commission finds that the
evidence before the Commission does not support reversing the decision of
the Director. In addition, other than what he observed from standing in the
doorway, there is no evidence presented by the Appellant concerning the
condition of the apartment after he took ownership of the apartment building
on November 30, 2010.
There is evidence that the
cleanliness and tidiness of the apartment has significantly improved since
the Form 4 Notice of Termination was filed and this will hopefully continue
in the future.
NOW THEREFORE ,
pursuant to the
Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission
Act and the
Rental of Residential Property Act:
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1.
The appeal is hereby denied.
2.
Order LD11-023 is hereby confirmed and remains in full
force and effect.
DATED
at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island,
the 3rd day of March, 2011.
BY
THE COMMISSION :
John Broderick, Commissioner
Michael Campbell, Commissioner
Leonard Gallant, Commissioner
NOTICE
Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and
26.(5) of the
Rental of Residential Property Act
provide as follows:
26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen
days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a
question of law only.
(3) The rules of court governing appeals apply
to an appeal under subsection (2).
(4) Where the Commission has confirmed,
reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken
within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may
file the order in the court.
(5) Where an order is filed pursuant to
subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.
NOTICE: IRAC File Retention
In accordance with the
Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material
contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the
Commission for a period of 2 years.
|